No results for “{{query}}”
Try:
Some results are missing. Stories loaded, but topics and authors did not answer. What is shown below is complete for stories.
Search is temporarily unavailable
You can still browse by topic, format, or place while we sort this out.
Nobody has ever finished a book by skimming it.
Reading quickly is a genuine skill and I do not want to argue against it. Most of what arrives in front of us deserves to be read quickly, or not at all.
Some writing is constructed so that the second half depends on the first in a way that skimming destroys. You can extract the argument, but the argument was not the point; the sequence was.
There is no way to tell which kind you are holding until you have slowed down enough to find out.
End of article
Travel
Law
Governance
Science
Governance
Culture
Administration
Literature
Philosophy
Literature
Nineteen public consultations and counting. The treatment-plant utilisation number is the one nobody publishes, and it is the only one that would tell you whether any of this works.
They published it at 4:15pm. I've added it to the piece as an update rather than a correction, since nothing in the original was wrong; it was simply unanswered.
The cascade point deserves more attention than it usually gets. Restoring a lake in isolation is a real improvement to that lake and almost nothing to the system.
Comment removed
Even so, the diversion drains are doing something; they buy time while the plants get built.